Second point taken. I hope you realize that 2.13 has bug fixes for
2.12--- yes? Without those, there is no project... I don't suppose you
took a look? Did you notice that in included tablature? If you had,
then you would perhaps have sent me a different 'Most spacing bugs can
be reproduced...' Also note that I made no claim of 'BUG'. I am new at
this and would more likely expect the problem to have been caused by
something I did, not a bug.
--hsm
p.s. I am sufficiently new that I've no idea (although I can guess and
goggle) what you snippet does.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Graham Percival
<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 09:57:00PM -0700, Hugh Myers wrote:
>> Pardon the length of the piece of code, but clearly demonstrates the
>> problem where as other pieces don't (got to be a page long for
>> instance...):
>
>> \version "2.13.7"
>
> I hope that you realize that 2.13.7 is an UNSTABLE, DEVELOPMENT
> release. If you would like to participate in de-bugging, your
> help would be appreciated, but please supply small,
> easy-to-understand examples.
>
> Most spacing bugs can be reproduced with something like
> \relative c' {
> \repeat unfold 128 { c4 c c c }
> }
>
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
