Thanks for your help! Normally I use barline checks- I didn't use Lilypond for a while and was a bit hasty.
ole Am 24.11.2009 um 23:32 schrieb Reinhold Kainhofer: > Am Dienstag, 24. November 2009 22:59:26 schrieb Ole Schmidt: >> Can someone please take a look at my code- it compiles whithout an >> errorwarning but looks very strange. Maybe I overlooked something simple? > > HINT: Sometimes it can be extremely helpful to add some barline > checks every now and then (actually, in all scores that I write with > lilypond, I insert a barcheck, i.e. a |, after each and evry measure, > and a bar number check, i.e. \barNumberCheck #10, every 5 or 10 > measures. > > See: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Bars#Bar-and-bar-number-checks > > The problem with your score is that you messed up one measure > somewhere down the line, so that the bar lines would happen > during notes, so lilypond can't find proper positions to break the > staves. > > Simply try to insert | every few measures and lilypond will immediately > tell you where the notes don't sum up nicely to these bar lines... > > Cheers, > Reinhold > > PS: I strongly discourage you to structure the lilypond input after the > original you are copying. In particular, while it might seem much easier > if you use one line in the lilypond file per music line on your original > score, > as soon as you get to the proofreading stage, you'll have trouble finding > the correct place in the lilypond file if you need to change some notes... > My advice is to add measure numbers to your original and structure the > input file by bar numbers. In particular, I usually write exactly one measure > per line, but for your score it might be easier to write exactly five > measures > per line in the lilypond file. > Since lilypond prints bar numbers in the output, you'll always easily find > the > lilypond code that generated a particular note... > > > PS 2: If you really don't find the problem(s) yourself: > -) Zweite Seite, fünfte Zeile: There is a 8. where an 8 would be correct > (i.e. > you have 1/16 too much in that measure) > -) Dritte Seite, dritte Zeile: I suppose the first ties as should be as4~, > while > in your example it takes the duration from the note before (i.e. a half > note). > -) Dritte Seite, fünfte Zeile: You write "\times 3/4 ces4 ", which is a > triplet on > the ces, not a 3/4 time signature (notice the difference between \times > and \time...) > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ > * Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria > * http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886 > * LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
