Joe Neeman <joenee...@gmail.com> writes: > It would certainly be possible, but I think it would be a bad idea. I > think that having two separate commands is much clearer than having a > command with two distinct behaviours depending on what its argument > is.
If the things that happen are conceptually the same, it is easier to have commands that are conceptually the same. Even if they are just named \setgrob and \setcontext or so. But calling them \set and \override does not give the impression that they are used for different kinds of data, but for different kinds of action. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
