I have no idea why a different override is required just for that oneOh dear!. More queer things going on. The picture may give you an idea why (to a certain extent). I have the impression you missed my suggestion in the last thread. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-09/msg00735.html It is effective in this case too. Cheers,
Robin
<<attachment: arpstem.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
