> Message: 3 > Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:47:44 +0200 > From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-l...@xs4all.nl> > Subject: Re: No fiddling claim > To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancs...@yahoo.com> > Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Message-ID: <1254160064.1689.5885.ca...@heerbeest> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Op maandag 28-09-2009 om 10:33 uur [tijdzone -0700], > schreef Jonathan > Wilkes: > > > I don't understand the meaning of > the statement "More often than not > > it isn't." > > What I meant to say is that certain tweaks are > fundamentally > not automatable. However, in many cases we > should expect > lilypond to do the right thing and if she doesn't, strive > to make it so.
That sounds good to me. > > > For example, in Op. 53 in NR 1.1: > > Link please? > > I do not see anything you mention here > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/Pitches#Pitches Yep, that's it. Right underneath The heading "1.1 Pitches", there's a dotted line, then two systems from a Beethoven Sonata with a green border around it. -Jonathan > > > Jan. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
