Hans Aberg wrote:
Isn't the lookup dynamic, so one only gets a warning when it actually
needs a glyph for an alteration? - But it is a good idea to define a
glyph for each alteration.
Yes, but we've overridden the glyph lookup to use strings
from external fonts. There's no need to define glyphs at
all except to suppress this warning. It's there because
some redundant code is still being executed. If we knew the
right plumbing we wouldn't need them at all, and should be
able to leave the X- and Y-extents implicit. But this is
the current state of the art.
Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
