On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 07:45:54PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op maandag 07-09-2009 om 14:43 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Graham > Percival: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:50:44AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > > However, I don't particularly want my photo on the lilypond > > website. This opens the possibility of having photos of some > > developers but not others, which might seem a big ragged or > > unbalanced. > > Why not?
I have quibbles about privacy on the internet. I've recently accepted having certain photos of me available (such as on my website)... 5 years ago I would have refused outright. I think I could find something to put there. However, I absolutely don't want to pressure other developers to put their photos online. Even if we don't explicitly ask people to do so, if there's only one developer without a photo, that creates some implied "peer pressure". OTOH, I guess we're all adults here; if somebody really doesn't want their photo online, they probably have enough strength of will to resist that implied pressure. Especially if we found another photo... for example, if I really refused, we could use some image of a cello in place of a photo. Developers: if anybody is uncomfortable with having their photo online, and would also feel uncomfortable about sticking out by having some animal picture or musical picture or wahtever instead of an actual photo, I'm more than willing to dig in my heels about this idea. Send me a private email if you'd like. > Or what about stealing a creative idea from > > http://www.fotosearch.com/photos-images/anonymous.html > > such as the profile. Not bad. At first, I thought the picture would be http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/da/AnonymousDemotivator.jpg which, although insanely cool, would be a trifle at odds with our professional new website. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
