Trevor Daniels wrote:
it seems like you're suggesting NR 5.3.4 is not correct.
I was talking about the 2.12 NR. I understood its unqualified "cannot" to be the well-meaning advice: - don't waste your time trying. So I didn't.
But Mark questioned this in July, and you updated the NR accordingly: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-07/msg00353.html (still awaiting release with 2.13.4).
Cheers, Robin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
