Frederick Dennis wrote: > In Sibelius, you put the key signature, e.g. F sharp major, then type > the plain letter names, e.g. f g a b c d e f which plays back as the > scale of F sharp major.
I knew there was a reason why I didn't like Sibelius ... 'simple' ways of working that wind up generating mental pain when you start doing anything the slightest bit complicated. > The Lilypond method seems a bit odd to start with, but "es" and "is" are > easily typed. What's the point of quibbling over it. > As Graham says, the coders got there first. The coders got it _right_. This is another instance of confusion between data entry and data storage -- see my post elsewhere in this thread: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Accidentals%3A-Unwanted-naturals-p25240064.html If you looked in Sibelius' underlying data structures, I doubt you'd see any 'following the key signature'. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
