Le vendredi 21 août 2009 à 08:49 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > You're using texinfo < 1.8.2. Yes, it would be nice if the > configure script checked for the doc-building programs (this > request is already on the tracker)...
It does, but this check is not enforced, only a warning is printed at the end of configure output. Many other documentation dependencies are not checked by configure, though. > but since John is working on > sconscript anyway, I'm not sure SCons is the best choice. I've been looking at Waf documentation too, this might be a better alternative for performance issues, as you or somebody else have already mentioned. > there's not much point fiddling with autoconf. Agreed. Cheers, John
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
