Hi, I have got some friends in the orchestra who are really afraid of tackling the Lilypond language. However I would really need them to share my workload of re-typesetting orchestral scores to get the parts.
What do you think about the quality of Lilypond outputs by MuseScore 0.94? I had a look at lilypond output one of the demo files and it seems to use the relative mode correctly and the lilypond file looks readable to me. How easy is it for a human to work on and maintain these output files? My long term plan is to give a player an orchestral part to typeset, then I collect all of their files and convert to Lilypond For the second stage, I create a common part which has common details of tempo, repeats, rehearsal section mark etc. Then I edit the orchestral lilypond parts and get rid of common things that are in the common parts and produce the full score, as well as lilypond orchestral parts files by combining the common part and the edited lilypond file. How workable is this arrangement? Could you offer a better startegy? Thanks! Daryna _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
