Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:21:17PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Graham
Percival<gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
Although I'm not fond of JavaScript, I think the solution here is
called thickbox:
http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/
No javascript. Besides, the display isn't the issue; what's at
issue is generating the images in an automatic, system-independent
way. (as in "not what's in the current makefile and examples/ dir")
Valentin, I've never used jquery before, but if you can implement
this, and the site is still functional with scripting *disabled*, then
I think we should definitely use it.
Ok, but the important questions still remain:
1. Do we want to display *different* images after a click, or just
*expanded* images?
I vote for expanded images, not different ones, just so people can
see them at a higher resolution and see how nice they look.
2. Is this an important feature? (if so, we can't use
javascript)
3. Who's going to create the .ly files, write the makefile, etc?
If the first two answers are "no, no", then I'll do the third.
Cheers,
- Graham
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
