I think that is EXCELLENT and certainly prettier than mine.
Which one to use depends which ones would serve the needs of a
particular score/chart better. Some performers prefer less information w/ a
textual description (ie play the G# key) whereas others prefer the graphical
representation that has more information (ghosted figures) but a clearer
representation of what goes where. I think that a good thing to do would be
to merge the two and create a text/graphical switch as an argument to the
markup. But when the merge happens (and when other instruments wind up
being made), I would say use yours as a template it looks amazing!
Cheers,
~Mike
On 7/8/09 6:10 AM, "Gilles THIBAULT" <gilles.thiba...@free.fr> wrote:
> I am a bit disapointed because a year ago i made a clarinet tablature but i
> never managed to make it compile by the LSR.
> I thought it was because the version on te LSR was to old so i decided to
> wait that the LSR update to the version "2.12", but i realize now that it
> was not a good idea because some others people spends propably a lot of time
> to make a clarinet tablature.
>
> So here is another proposal.
> In clarTab.html you have a little explaination how to get each examples you
> have in clarTab.pdf.
>
> Gilles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
