Kieren MacMillan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> At the time i needed this note, it was NOT available in lilypond.
>
> Although I don't have an older version of Lilypond to check against,
> I image my function would have worked for several versions now.
> In other words, this workaround has probably been available in
> Lilypond for several years, if not longer.
>
>> I asked in this forum for confirmation; an issue was opened (not by
>> me): See
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=648&can=1&start=600
>
> That issue simply indicates that Lilypond doesn't have a native
> double-breve glyph, not that Lilypond can't *look* like it has a
> native double-breve glyph! ;-)
> My point is, I would be very surprised if the list you have of
> "things Lilypond can't do" actually contains *anything* Lilypond
> can't do.
>
I see no difference between the two following sentences
1) Lilypond can't do this.
2) Lilypond can do this, but nobody, including lilypond gurus, were able to
do this.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Real-World-Usage-tp22935326p22970992.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
