-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 14:27:28 -0700 > Von: "Carl D. Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> > An: Tao Cumplido <tao_lilypondu...@gmx.net>, "lilypond-user@gnu.org" > <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Betreff: Re: custom drumstyle-tables with custom noteheads?
Uh, it's me again. Actually I made it to write a workaround that does the job. Better late than never. ^^ I still have to prepare a presentable sample before I post the result here though. > Yes, the .cc files are very hard to understand. But after you look at a > bunch of them, it gets better.... > > You can see where the styles are actually used to get glyph names in > scm/output-lib.scm. Well, instead of medling further with the installation files I wrote now a workaround function that actually ignores the 'style property of the grob completely and just checks on the drumnote-name, i.e. bassdrum and overrides the 'stencil property with the function from the other thread to create custom stencils which produce different results depending on the duration-log. I think that's actually more or less the same you had in mind below. > Maybe, but this seems like too much of a hack to me. But it's possible, I > suppose. But if I were going to do it in this fashion, I think I'd add a > new style to the drumStyleTable and then try to write a new print function > that checks the style, and if it's parallelogram, use the parallelogram > print routine, otherwise, use the regular notehead print routine. > > Now that I think about it, this approach is a promising way to do this > without needing to add any font glyphs (which I think would be needed to > define a new style). You already have a template for how to do this in > your > parallelogram function that Neil wrote. It checks the grob, and if its > duration is 2, it writes the parallelogram. Otherwise, it calls the > regular > notehead stuff. > But I think the output will likely be better if you define new glyphs in > the > font and define a new style. Eventually it'd definitely be easier to use and I think with some more tinkering I might even be able to do it but right now it works like I want it to and I prefer not to play with the installation files. Regards, Tao -- Psssst! Schon vom neuen GMX MultiMessenger gehört? Der kann`s mit allen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/multimessenger01 _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
