On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Arnout Engelen <arnou...@bzzt.net> wrote:
> Do you have any ideas for improving low-resolution output? My script is of > course just a proof of concept - what would be the 'right' way and place to > tackle this? The 101 number was chosen such that a (IIRC) the staff spaces are an integral number of pixels apart, but individual staves may still be shifted fractional pixels wrt each other. There is really no "right" way; all of the formatting engine assumes floating point numbers for positioning, and rounding in the final output may produce uneven distances between staves, which you probably don't want either. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
