It's been my understanding that most viewers and applications will
render a .ps file by way of a low resolution bitmap 'preview', so as not
to clog RAM while you're working on files. When you go to print or
export the file, the .ps file is rendered at whatever resolution you
specify in your document properties (depending on which application
you're using). At least, this used to be the case. Is this still typical?
M Watts wrote:
François Labadens wrote:
I tried to use the .ps output, but it's not so good as the .pdf one.
It's the
same thing under Windows XP or Ubuntu 7.10.
Do you have any solutions ?
It does look pretty grainy by itself, but it's used to produce a great
looking pdf, so it shouldn't be a major worry.
What do you want to use the .ps files for? LaTeX, or graphics work,
or print outs...?
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
