On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:42:35AM -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Graham, > >> Sure it can! But unless you help, it won't. :) Just suggest >> the exact text to add or subtract, and it'll be done within days >> by Jonathan. > > To be honest, I don't feel that I understand *why* the change in my > Scheme made it work, so I don't feel good suggesting a doc fix. I simply > added parentheses, removed them, shuffled things around, and so on until > it finally *did* work "as expected", then tried to reverse-engineer > *why*. (I'm not sure I'm even right in the reasoning I posted, unless > someone like Nicholas confirms it…) > > I'm pretty sure that's not a *great* place for a doc-writer to start > from… ;-)
Hey, that's way more than I know about the subject. Remember my rule for doc-work: "you don't need to be perfect; you just need to be better than nothing". Especially in NR 6. If you can't think of anything else, just send "Sometimes you need to delete the word `cons' and add some parentheses in random places". At least that'll give some kind of hint to the next person. And if GDP 2 ever gets around to NR 6, we'll clean it up then. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user