Cameron Horsburgh a écrit :
I'm running a 2.4 GHz P4 with 1.25 Gig of Ram. The machine is aging,
but it should be up to this challenge. I've noticed scores compile
much quicker on much lower specced machines, so I'm suspecting
something peculiar to my installation, but I don't know where to look.
The exclusive use of spacer rests may be a bit perverse to process by
LilyPond; is it faster if you replace all spacer rests s1 with full rests
R1? I think this has little to do with your installation.
Does anybody have any idea what could be wrong? Or is it normal to
take 13 minutes to process a score with virtually no music?
On my Intel 64 bit box, I get it to compile in 94 seconds:
real 1m33.675s
user 1m28.378s
sys 0m0.721s
This is much for such a simple score.
Anyway, here's the file in question:
ragged-last-bottom = t
ragged-bottom = t
What do you expect to get with these settings?
John
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
