On 12/27/08 9:25 AM, "Antanas Budri?nas" <antan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2008/12/27 Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com>:
>> 2008/12/27 Antanas Budri?nas <antan...@gmail.com>:
>>> Thanks Arjan, thanks Francisco for replies.
>>> Perhaps due my poor English you both misunderstood me.
>>> There is a simplified example:
>>
>>> { \xi \xii \xi \xiii }
>>> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>>>
>>> Would be nice that all this code results the same score as from
>>> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
>>> \relative c' { << {e f g f e f e d} {c d e d c d c b}>> }
>>
>> You get something close by means of
>> { \new Voice \xi \xii \xi \xiii }
>
> Only *close* :) As well as with \new Staff I get all notes on one
> staff instead of voices on separate staves. Imagine an orchestral
> score :)
Aha! I got it! The secret was to explicitly name the Staff and Voice
contexts, and use \context instead of \new.
\version "12.0.0"
intro = <<
\context Staff = "StaffOne" {
\context Voice = "VoiceOne" {
c''4 c''
}
}
\context Staff = "StaffTwo" {
\context Voice = "VoiceTwo" {
c'4 c'
}
}
>>
verseOne = <<
\context Staff = "StaffOne" {
\context Voice = "VoiceOne" {
d''4 d'
}
}
\context Staff = "StaffTwo" {
\context Voice = "VoiceTwo" {
d'4 d'
}
}
>>
chorus = <<
\context Staff = "StaffOne" {
\context Voice = "VoiceOne" {
e''4 e''
}
}
\context Staff = "StaffTwo" {
\context Voice = "VoiceTwo" {
e'4 e'
}
}
>>
verseTwo = <<
\context Staff = "StaffOne" {
\context Voice = "VoiceOne" {
f''4 f''
}
}
\context Staff = "StaffTwo" {
\context Voice = "VoiceTwo" {
f'4 f'
}
}
>>
\score {
{
\intro
\verseOne
\chorus
\verseTwo
}
}
HTH,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
