Arjan Bos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It certainly seems weird and I can understand why it is. And I know it
> is very hard to write good parsing error messages, but if I now jump
> to the error, it jumps away from my typo into a perfectly correct
> file. And I can't help but wondering that it might be very useful if
> the error was pointing at the file with the actual error in it instead
> of pointing at a perfectly correct file.
No, your typo in includeError causes an error in includedError.
There's nothing wrong with your "y" in includeError. The error really
*is* in includedError.
E.g., if includedError did contain
\version "2.11.57"
= \relative c' { a b c }
then everything would be okay and there would be no error.
As I said, weird, but logical.
And no too hard to live with ;).
-- Johan
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
