On 11/17/08 5:35 AM, "Ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm puzzled. I understand that you installed 2.11, and 2.11.63 appears in the
> first snippet, but when you give the code for the piece, it shows the version
> as 2.10.33. <http://2.10.33.> Did you not run convert-ly against your .ly
> files? If not, that could be a source of problems.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:20 PM, chip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just installed 2.11 and re-ran a piece that parsed fine in 2.10, and you
>> can
>> see a warning message in the results below -
>>
There is no problem with the file. The only issue is that the spacing
engine has changed, and the piece fits on one page, but only if the systems
are slightly squeezed together from the first estimate. As long as the
music looks fine, then the compilation has succeeded.
Thanks,
Carl
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
