2008/11/3 Toine Schreurs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Redundancy is not the solution. Yes, in general, repetition is a good > technique to become familiar with something unknown. The first read gives > questionmarks, the second one gives the Aha's. > > But it is almost impossible to maintain documentation if the information > is somehow duplicated over different locations. > The adagium "Single Point Of Information" is much more important than > Redundancy, especially for rapid-changing programs like Lilypond.
I don't think that an informal page like the one I linked needs to be in the official documentation, and it is not affected by changes in LilyPond. Granted, there *is* an official FAQ page, but it is not evolving, it is outdated (e.g. speaks about sponsoring). We should remember it exists and maintain it, link more frequently to it... or use a wiki. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
