Eyolf Østrem wrote:
> I suppose this thread brings up the issue of styles: since the mentioned
> clef is not really a new SIGN just a different GLYPH, are there other such
> signs that we want?
The one I stumbled across some while ago is an alternate D'al Segno
glyph, depicted here:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=659
(It is marked as Enhancement, which probably fits better than Defect,
right?)
This one has the benefit that it's written much clef-like in the staff
and thus spares vertical space; on the other hand, it will probably
require some more work than "just" drawing a glyph. I don't think such a
positioning is currently supported by any (Rehearsal_?)mark_engraver...
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
