Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:33 PM, John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> It may be possible to parallelize some portions of LilyPond code to take
>> advantage of multi-core machines, which gradually become quite common,
>> I'm tempted to have a look at it in the next months, but don't hold your
>> breath :-)
>
> One tricky aspect is that the GUILE evaluator is fundamentally broken:
> it rewrites Scheme expressions for memoization in thread-unsafe ways
> all over the place.
>
> For Lily itself, I think it will also be very tricky: evaluating grob
> properties through callbacks is assumes that there is only one
> evaluation going on at the same time.
>
You mean there must be only one .ly file on the command-line?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Does-lilypond-takes-advantage-of-multi-cores-on-windows--tp19800443p19808301.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
