On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Patrick Horgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks, it let me get a good look at it. All in all, so far I prefer > Patrick's except for unvisited links. It's not obvious enough that they are > something to click on until I hover. The color is so close to the color of > the normal text, (Firefox 3 on Linux), that even the font difference isn't > enough to tell. Jacob Nielson's guidelines are based on extensive usability > studies with experienced and non-experienced web users. They really make a > difference. Note that he says that you don't necessarily have to underline > if the color difference is noticable enough, but that you should never > underline anything else on a web page because people think that denotes a > link. He also says never use blue text even if that's not your link color > because people expect blue text to be clickable.
Hi Patrick, If you have any suggestions for different colors in any part of my design, please post them. I am not very knowledgable with color theory (yet). Regarding the link underlining, this is still under debate, and I'm undecided. Thanks for your comments, -Patrick _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
