On 8/26/08, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/8/25 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Kieren, > >> However, if the Lilypond community is depending on *any* resource as >> heavily >> as it appears to be (or want to be) relying on the LSR, that resource >> needs >> to maintain ~ 99% uptime. > > The LSR brings many advantages and it would be a disaster to not have > it anymore.
I wouldn't say that it would be a disaster; I still don't think that it's been used enough to say that the loss would be *that* bad. > And note that many LSR snippets are duplicated in LilyPond sources > (input/lsr/). Indeed -- if LSR dropped off the face of the planet, the docs would be entirely unaffected. I wouldn't have allows the system to be set up in any other way. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
