Anthony W. Youngman wrote: > > The problem is that most of the people who actually do the work with > lilypond, while they want it to be "the best tool for producing printed > music", they're European orchestral musicians steeped in the European > orchestral tradition, and their traditions are at odds with yours and > mine. >
lilypond can be viewed as PRE-producing music, not really producing. You use the output of lilypond, as the input to another (free or paying) software. The choice of this software depends on what exactly you want to do/modify. In fact, lilypond itself is composed of 2 softwares, lilypond and GS, which use the output of lilypond. Surely, you can then set up a pipeline of how many softs you want, each one being specialized for a particular task. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Putting-%27instrument%27-on-the-left-side-of-the-page-tp19131449p19132607.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
