What part of "in a few months" was unclear? In a few months, once 2.12 is out and the only (stable) docs refer to LM and NR, it will be second nature.
If anybody doesn't understand what these two letter acronyms refer to, they clearly haven't ready LM 1.2, and therefore I have absolutely *no* sympathy for them. We've spent over a thousand hours working on the docs in the last year alone, and probably approaching four thousand hours in total. If people don't read those docs, they have only themselves to blame. - Graham On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 12:03:33 +0200 "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not for me :-) > Actually LM is ambiguous. It seems that lot of people interprets that > as LilyPond Manual. > > I hate TLA-s a lot and will always hate them. > > Bert > > Graham Percival wrote: > > In a few months, these will be second nature. There's no point > > typing out "please see the Notation Reference 1.2.3" every time. > > NR 1.2.3 is unambiguous, and saves time for people who spend time > > answering rtfm questions. > > > > Cheers, > > - Graham > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 11:36:07 +0200 > > "Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> May I ask you not use the abbreviaton of the various documentation > >> parts on the LilyPond user list? > >> I may be very short on mental capabilities, but I just can't (and > >> well, actually don't want to) remember these codes. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> > >> Bert > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lilypond-user mailing list > >> lilypond-user@gnu.org > >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
