2008/6/11 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Bullshit. There may be one point on which I tend to agree with Arjan: it's not always handy to constantly put a hash character before text strings.
If I remember correctly (but I may have been hallucinating), you have some functions in your framework that allow you to enter some strings without preceding them with a hash. Is it correct? How do you do it? > Tis its extensibility that make LilyPond more likely to be able to > fit the more users needs, and its extensibility is made possible > because LilyPond is programmable (by the users). How could you get > rid off a full featured language -- scheme -- from LilyPond input > files without reimplementing it, badly most certainly. If I understood correctly, he's not complaining about the Scheme integration itself but the way it is parsed. Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
