Um, no, not at all. That's not the problem. Looking at it some more it seems that what I need is more clef changes in and out of the cues in order to insure that different transpositions of the main part,including transpositions involving different clefs will produce the results I'm after.

-David

Graham Percival wrote:
Isn't this what \transposition and/or octave checks are for?
Please see NR 1.1 Pitches.

Cheers,
- Graham

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:39:15 +0000
David Bobroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I've realized that I may have painted myself into a bit of a corner. I'm working on an orchestral part with cues. The main part needs to be transposed. I have defined the cues and the main part in separate blocks. I have used \relative for both. Now I'm realizing that
perhaps it would have been more clever to define the cues with
absolute pitches rather than using \relative so I can really freeze
their positions (I want the cues at their original pitches when the
main part is transposed).

Is there an elegant fix for this or do I simply have to go through
the cue definitions and enter all the , and ' for their absolute
pitches?

-David


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to