Trevor Daniels schrieb:
Hi Till
Might the tempo indication and metronome marks be better placed in the Rhythm
section? If you think so let me know, as I'm working on Rhythms right now.
Trevor D
Hi,
I think we should leave it as it is, after all it is nothing to do with
_rythms_ specifically to indicate the tempo. I think it relates more
with markup questions so I will see how to link to that section and
explain only the relevant stuff directly related to the placement of
context elements to a staff (as I would see tempo and instrument name...)
Till
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+t.daniels=treda.co.u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Till Rettig
Sent: 24 February 2008 13:19
To: lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: GDP: staff section
Hi GDP-helpers!
I started now finally with the staff section of NR1.
As with the repeat section, I would also suggest
some new grouping.
The order of the section is now the following:
# 1.6 Staff notation
* 1.6.1 Displaying staves
o 1.6.1.1 System start delimiters
o 1.6.1.2 Staff symbol
o 1.6.1.3 Hiding staves
* 1.6.2 Writing parts
o 1.6.2.1 Metronome marks
o 1.6.2.2 Instrument names
o 1.6.2.3 Quoting other voices
o 1.6.2.4 Formatting cue notes
I was first wondering why "writing parts" is here
at all, but I guess
this should not be discussed too broad now,
because it had been
discuessed when we decided about the GDP chapter
order. I was just
thinking that "combining parts" and "writing
parts" would be together
something like a "orchestral" chapter -- even
though you use it also in
chamber music and the like. So I hope this
grouping as it now is is
intuitive enough to a new user that he figures
out where to look for.
The 1.6.1 section is really unevenly distributed
over the three
subsubsections, I was thinking of introducing a
new subsection:
modifying staves which would contain most of
6.1.1 and 6.1.2
So the new section model could be:
1.6 Staff notation
1.6.1 Displaying/writing/setting staves
1.6.1.1 Initiating a new staff (short
basics, also one sentence
about \new and \context, here should also go the
example about starting
stopping additional staves)
1.6.1.2 Grouping staves (about system
start delimiters
(maybe: 1.6.1.3: Deeper nesting of staff groups)
1.6.2 Modifying staves
1.6.2.1 Staff symbol, (and how to modify
the different parameters)
1.6.2.2 Ossia staves
1.6.2.3 Hiding staves
1.6.3 Writing parts
...
I have concentrated for now on this part leaving
the parts section
alone, I want to come back to it only when the
first part is in better
condition.
There are still some general questions for the
parts section for which I
would like to hear some feedback:
-Why is the metronome mark described here? It
applies as well to a whole
score (where it would be agreedly on the top
stave...), and I think it
should go together with a general description on
how to write tempo
indications (and also with a workaround to align
the indication with the
key or the meter, not with the first note of the
first bar). Where could
this section go?
It is currently discussed in text marks, 1.8.1.4,
but meant to write
rehearsal marks, not tempo indications.
-I think it is actually almost a bug in lilypond
that there is no easy
way to center the beginning of a tempo
indictation on the key symbol, so
I think it is important to provide at least an
workaround clearly marked
as such for this purpose.
-We see the parts section as the sections that
explains everything
general about single parts -- so in this sense
the metronome mark
belongs here and also the tempo indication. But
to me (and my German
ears) the section caption points at preparing
parts for each instrument
of a bigger score. So I think we should change
this section's caption.
Ideas?
-To me there is a distinction between the two
first subsubsections
(metronome marks and instrument names) and the
two last (quoting voices
and cue notes): the first two I would see more
generally apllying to
staves for each instrument/voice, the two last
are what I understand by
the word "part", mainly concerned about the case
where one has only
one's own part and needs to get some context into
it. So I could even
imagine still a new subsection:
1.6.3 Additions to specific staves
1.6.3.1 tempo indication
1.6.3.2 metronome mark
1.6.3.3 instrument name
1.6.4 Adding context to a single part
1.6.4.1 quoting
1.6.4.2 cue notes
But this is only a first thought.
Greetings
Till
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
