On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:08:09 -0800 "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Interesting! However, as this example indicates, it's not > > specific to articulations. We'll add info to LM 3 and > > NR 3 about this. > > > > Since there's nothing specific about articulations here, we'll > > remove it from NR 1.3. > > Just to be clear about this: > > -- In NR 1.3, we will only be explaining the \ syntax for > articulations and ornamentations. > -- The - syntax will only be explained for the `shorthands' > > Is this correct? To be clear about this... "probably". "Almost certainly"? At the moment, I'm envisioning a sentence-link to the "When to add -" subsection in NR 3, just like we have a sentence-link to "Controlling direction and placement". But I only learned about the - issue an hour or two ago. I don't want to say "definitely" until I find out a bit more about this. For now, only explain the \ syntax for articulations (and add that example). Dump a FIXME: comment for the shorthands and move on to other material in your section. I estimate that I won't have any kind of final decision until the weekend. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
