On Feb 11, 2008 8:10 AM, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
> Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for all the different suggestions! Again, this shows the
> > flexibility of Lilypond - there is no one correct solution, but many
> possible
> > ones.
> > I'm preparing an LSR snippet to highlight all the different approaches.
> >
> I just sent yet another solution, that you might want to include.
> > While testing it, I found out that lilypond 2.10 and 2.11 treat the
> vertical
> > position of dynamics and markups quite differently. While in 2.10, all
> texts
> > are vertically aligned, there are some collisions. In 2.11, on the other
> > hand, there are no collisions (unless you force them by setting
> > with-dimensions), but the vertical positions look terrible and are not
> > aligned at all.
> >
> > I'm attaching the .ly file and the corresponding pdfs from 2.10.33 and
> 2.11.39
> > (joined into one pdf to stay below the 64kB size limit of the mailing
> list).
> >
> > Is the behavior in 2.11.39 intended or a bug?
> >
> Of course it's intentional ;-) In version 2.11, there's a general
> mechanism to
> avoid collisions between different objects outside the stave, by moving
> them
> up or down if necessary to get them out of the way.
>
> What layout would you like to see? If you want to avoid the collisions,
> you could
> either shift some of the dynamics up or down, as is currently done in
> 2.11, or you
> could change the note spacing so that the dynamics can stay on a single
> line without
> collisions. If you want to try what such a solution looks like, you can
> use
> \override DynamicText #'extra-spacing-width = #'(0 . 0.5)
> see Section 4.4.3 Outside Staff objects in the Learning Manual for
> version 2.11
> for more information on such tweaks.



As a sidenote, I've been extremely busy the last couple of months and so
haven't been keeping up with most of the doc improvements. I just clicked
over to 4.4.3 in the LM and I have to say that I'm extremely impressed. IMO
we've needed fully written-out examples of how the different settings and
attributes interact for quite some time. (This is especially true of
spacing). And the LM looks to be precisely that.

I don't know who authored those particular pages, but I'm both impressed and
grateful. I'll look forward to reading through the other LM sections soon.


Trevor.




-- 
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to