Latest GDP docs http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
(although these are almost identical to the 2.11.39 docs at the moment) Do we want index entries for snippets? For example, in NR 1.1.3.2 Key signature there are two snippets: suppressing natural signs in key signatures, and non-standard key signatures. Do you want to have items like: @cindex key signatures, suppressing natural signs @cindex don't print natural signs in key signatures @cindex key signatures, non-standard @cindex key signatures, whole tone pointing to these? Adding index entries for all the snippets increases the amount of work that we need to do on each doc section, of course. I'm personally not convinced that these are necessary -- after all, if a user can't find "key signature" in the index, he won't be able to find "key signature, suppressing natural signs". And if he _is_ looking a way to avoid printing natural signs in key signatures, I think he'd look at "key signatures" even if there wasn't a "key signature, suppressing natural signs" entry. More examples are in NR 1.2.1.2 Tuplets such as @funindex tupletNumberFormatFunction @funindex tupletSpannerDuration and @cindex tuplet bracket length @cindex triplet bracket length @cindex bracket length, tuplets Of course, I famously never use the index, so I'm not the best person to judge whether certain index entries are helpful or not. Discuss. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
