2007/12/3, Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > No need to use lilypond-book (I have never used it). It requires > > knowledge about the LaTeX format, which is waaay more complicated than > > HTML. > > > Wrong! lilypond-book supports not only LaTeX but also HTML, so if > the images are intended to be included on a web page, liliypond-book is > certainly a preferable solution.
Ooops! Didn't know about that; as I've told Albert I've never used it. I thought the only way to manage HTML output was to use texinfo, which is kind of TeX-based anyway? By the way, is it me or the whole Appendix D is currently unaccessible on the main web docs? (which is why I'm CCing Graham this answer, didn't feel like starting a new thread). Regards, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
