Yes, these time sigtanatures are ridiculous -- but they are needed to produce the visual I'm after. I'm notating an electronic part; I have four performers playing at 4 different tempi, and the electronic part plays groups of four artiuclations, each quantized to a beat in a different tempo -- hence the strange timesigs on the staff containing this part.
But I still don't understand Valentin -- you're telling me you can't tap out rhythms in 2667/25276 time? :) Best, Adam On 11/27/07, Valentin Villenave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/11/26, Adam James Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using some complicated time signatures, like 3599/11748 followed > > by 2667/25276 followed by 177/568, etc. (I have a good reason for this). > > Just out of curiosity... How good can any reason be? > > :-) > > Valentin > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
