2007/11/3, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Quoting Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Does anybody object if I rename Program Reference to Internals
> > Reference? or maybe Tweak Reference? or... ? (renaming Program Usage
> > is also an option)
>
> ... or merging it with Notation Reference, where it belongs.... :-)
Not at all! The notation Reference is here to help users produce
scores using predefined commands and interface, whereas the Internals
Reference describes the way LilyPond *internally* works, to possibly
allow them to change the interface itself.
I vote for "Internals Reference" (by the way, I'm not sure if we have
to say "Internals" or "Internal Reference" -- as a French guy, I'd
prefer the adjective). Besides, this is already how we used to call it
in the Documentation sources, with @internalsref{} links.
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
