Currently we have a few different ways of introducing examples in the
docs. Should we standardize on a particular way, or just let doc
writers do whatever they want?
Currently we have a combination of four different ways.
1) The text just continues directly into
c'4\mf
2) The text suggests that one may do foo,
c'4^"foo"
3) The text directs the reader to the following example:
<< c'4 { e g } >>
4) The text forms a complete sentence.
c'4^-\mark \default
Should allow all? Specify one method? Disallow one or two methods?
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user