fiëé visuëlle wrote:
samples (in contrary to the PDF), and often I only need a working sample
of usage (the in-text samples are often too short or not on topic as I
understand it or too cluttered - or too simple).
Hmm. Samples are too sort, too cluttered, or too simple. That will be
hard to fix. :)
BTW I'd like to see an forever-working URL like
http://lilypond.org/doc/current/Documentation/ (instead of the version;
should need only one symlink; maybe "current-stable" and "current-dev").
Well,
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.11/Documentation/
gives you the current-dev. Yes, you need to update this link whenever
we release a new stable branch... but that only happens once or twice a
year.
My preference is for 2 -- I can't believe that users want to see
articulations, dynamics, and trills on the same HTML page. But as I
said, we should probably disregard my opinion on this issue.
If you rework the docs anyway, then 2 is good. Otherwise I'd prefer 1.
We're reworking the docs now. :) ok, one more vote for 2.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
