This is a known issue,
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=381&can=2&q=accidental
Cheers,
- Graham
Tao Cumplido wrote:
Well, in this example from the Regression tests it does.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.10/input/regression/lily-dd43efc1a7.ly
And so it did in my score, which I actually have never seen before, so I found
it quite strange not to have an accidental style which solves this.
Actually I solved the problem myself later.
I think I used '\override Accidental #'after-line-break = ##f'.
Hmm, I just checked the same example from above in the regression tests of
version 2.11 and the accidental is indeed not printed after the line break,
although it says that it should.
regards,
Tao
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 17:43:52 +0200
Von: "Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Betreff: Re: tied note accidentals after line break
2007/6/14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
hello,
Hi Tao,
sorry for not having answered sooner; the list is quiet today, so it
gives more time to look for unanswered posts.
is there a general way to prevent accidentals of tied notes from being
printed after a line break?
I don't really understand what you're talking about; when I try the
following snippet the accidental is not printed again after the line
break.
{ c1 d e fis ~ \break fis2 g e 2 }
Can you tell us more about it?
Regards,
Valentin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
