Cameron Horsburgh wrote:
There is one problem --- the explanatory note is extremely large, and
dwarfs the picture of the snippet itself. There also seems to be a
problem with the line wrapping.
I can't see any problem with wrapping... what do you see?
However, it might be better to put the
explanation in a comment in the lily code, and a note to that effect
in the explanation. This way the explanation will stay with the
snippet, and will be a little easier to read.
To clarify this, you're talking about the technical stuff later on,
right? The initial text about chants is beautiful and should definitely
remain in the description.
I have some other issues with the "using the template" section:
1. Don't stick stuff inside the LilyPond app. You can use directories
inside your \include, as in
\include "~/lilyincludes/my-init.ly"
2. I'm not certain that the info about lilypond-book is appropriate
here. The anglican template is quite usable on its own, and your
texinfo tweaks (headers) are quite usable on _their_ own. Maybe the
lilypond-book stuff (with the headers and footers) could go in a
separate snippet? (I'm not really certain about this; LSR is optimized
for pure lilypond snippets, but it would be nice to have _somewhere_ to
stick neat tricks like this)
3. I think the shell script and directory listing are going a bit
overboard.
The lilypond template itself looks awesome, though. Thanks!
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
