On 1/31/07, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Trevor Bača escreveu:
> 1. The heavy lifting of the program implemented in (compiled) C++ code
> with tweaks being made in (interpreted, dynamic) Scheme code.
> Capitalized names in lily input generally refer to the C++ guts while
> other properties in overrides talk directly to the Scheme code. Beyond
do you mean \consists "Foo_engraver" ?
Yup.
It might make sense to mangle those names, so we have uniform,
scheme style naming for that too.
Agreed.
--
Trevor Bača
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
