Yeah, that would be a good solution satisfying everyone.

Frédéric


2006/12/18, Kress, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


You could compromise and use "2/3" to indicate current fractional time the
way it works now, but support using "3:2" to be more "musically intuitive".
I.e., the separator denotes the meaning; '/' for raw division and ":" for
ratio.  Not knowing how the parser works, it could even be done by the
parser itself, automatically converting "3:2" to "2/3"...

This also has the virtue of not breaking existing files.

Stephen


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
behalf of David Rogers
Sent: Mon 12/18/2006 3:48 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Constructive Criticism and a Question

Carl Youngblood wrote:

>There are also places where 3/2 is necessary with the current way of
>doing things.  For example, I was just doing a piece in 12/8 time
>where triplets are the norm and I needed to do eighth notes with a
>two feel.  In this case I had to use \times 3/2 { c8 c } etc.  I
>guess in this case you're saying it would be more intuitive to do
>2/3?  I really don't mind the way things are now.  It's a syntax that
>has to be learned anyway, and once you learn it, it seems about the
>same effort either way.


The way the syntax is now, is (in musical terms) the opposite of what's
printed. Having the syntax match the print is likely to be easier to learn
for at least the majority, if not everyone. (The way the syntax is now, it
makes mathematical sense; which is nice - but I don't think it serves a
practical purpose.)

David


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

2006-12-18, 16:52:20
The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments may
be privileged and confidential.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If
you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your computer.

 2006-12-18, 16:24:45
The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments may
be privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any
attachments from your computer.

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to