Mats Bengtsson escreveu: >> OK, thank you, that's very clear. That fact, for any given keyword, >> would tell a user immediately whether (s)he could just write a macro or >> would be forced to define a function for some expression involving the >> keyword. >> >> Is the information >> (1) number of arguments >> or preferably >> (2) the syntax >> documented explicitly anywhere for all keywords? >> > As already said, this is not available in the current manual and one > problem is that > this would still just tell a small part of the full syntax. Another
This should be rather easy to add to the manual. I believe some of the functions already have doc strings. It shouldn't be too hard to extract them in dump them into the program reference. A neat task for a scheme hacker... Nicolas? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen LilyPond Software Design -- Code for Music Notation http://www.lilypond-design.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
