So the solution is to set the barnumber manually - \set Score.currentBarNumber = #... ?!

Luc

----- Original Message ----- From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "luc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: correct barnumber after repeat volta


I cannot recall having seen such bar numbering in any printed score

One example is the Mazurka of J. K. Mertz for Guitar Duos published by Chanterelle. Though in this case it is not necessary to number this way, because both guitars have the same repeats at the same place, it leads to confusion when somebody refers to measure numbers in the one edition and the others have first to add or deduct the number of the repeated measures to get to the right place...

(except for some pieces where some instruments have different music
in the two repeats, so they have the repeat printed out, whereas the rest
of the instrumental parts were typeset with repeats).

  /Mats

luc wrote:
I believe it is common practice to add the number of repeated measures to determine the bar number after the repeat. Lilypond does not.
What's the reason and is there a workaround for that?
Thanks
Luc



_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user


--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson
Signal Processing
Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology
SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to