On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:39:57PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Steve D wrote: > >After thinking about it for awhile, I agree with Werner and like his > >idea better also, if it can be done. [...] > ><c~ e g bes~> would mean that only the c and b-flat would be tied > ><c e g bes>~ would mean that the whole chord would be tied > ><c~ e g bes~>~ would mean--well, LilyPond would issue an error message? > >The whole-chord tie would take precedence? ;-) > > After some thought, I agree with Werner (as usual), and I've changed the > implementation to do this.
Thank you so much Han-Wen for implementing this sponsored feature (chords in which some but not all notes are tied) and especially for being able to use Werner's clear and easy idea for notating a partially-tied chord. If you work on the issue where in dotted chords that contain an interval of a second, the dots can be too close to a following chord, discussed in the following thread-- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-08/msg00342.html please send the invoice to me and I'll pay for it promptly via PayPal. I'm also interested in sponsoring (preferably with one or more other interested people) work on cross-staff chords as has been discussed on this thread-- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-08/msg00379.html I believe that at this point Trevor Baca and I are both willing to co-sponsor it. (Right, Trevor?) Does anyone else wish to help sponsor cross-staff chords, which is an important feature but also a considerable project in terms of Han-Wen's time and attention. Once again, thank you very much Han-Wen, Steve Steve Doonan New Mexico US -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- I am an old man and have known a great many troubles, but most of them never happened. -Mark Twain ---------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
