Quoting Daniel Tonda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mats:
You're absolutely right. I tried it and it certainly is faster and produces
the same output.
The only difference is PDFLaTeX's output is bigger, any reason why?
I'm not sure, but I know that everyone of the lily-*-*.pdf files for
each score line that are included in the document using
\includegraphics contains the LilyPond fonts embedded when you use the
new PDFLaTeX support
in lilypond-book, whereas in the latex+dvips+ps2pdf mode, the corresponding
.eps files don't contain any fonts at all. Instead the fonts are included
once for the full postscript file (that's why we need the -h *.psfonts
flag to dvips). I'm not sure how clever pdflatex is, if it duplicates
the font information. If it does, then that's probably the explanation.
/Mats
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
