Hi Mats,
I gave it a little thought. And actually, I like the idea to use the
\markup{} expression. Constructing notes with stems will get a lot easier I
guess. As you said using this directly in my lytex file won't work. Cropping
from the output from a straight lilypond file won't work either due the
footer.
I thought of this approach:
Making a \pagestyle{empty} lilypond book latex file with the \markup
expression in it.
Convert page 2 of the dvi file to ps
Excute ps2epsi mychar.ps mychar.eps
When I take a look at this eps file it looks as I expected. But when I
include this in a new LaTeX file, out of nowhere the footer pops up again in
the eps file. By footer I mean the "Music engraving by LilyPond 2.8.6-
www.lilypond.org" line at the bottom of the picture.
If there's no other solution, I'm considering to convert the ps to pdf,
convert it back to ps, etc. But life would get a whole lot easier if there's
a way to delete the footer right from the beginning. So I could just make a
lilypond file and crop that output.
Thanks,
tiM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mats Bengtsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: maandag 14 augustus 2006 10:06
> To: tiM
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Feta symbols in latex
>
>
>
> tiM wrote:
>
> >>The most convenient solution for you, would have been if
> such a short
> >>score could contain just a simple \markup{...} expression,
> just as an
> >>.ly file can.
> >>However, it seems that the resulting inserted .eps file
> will have lots
> >>of white space around the actual markup, so it will end up
> on a page
> >>of its own in the document.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >If there's no other way out I'll just have to adjust eps
> boundery boxes
> >manualy, but I was hoping to do something less laborious
> like using the
> >real fonts for the job, as you discriped below...
> >Now something funny happened. I was doing as you said and
> removed the
> >folder i copied to my miktex folder. All of the sudden I cant find
> >feta??.tex files anywhere. I guess I found that files as a
> leftover of an older installation.
> >
> >
> Probably (which means that they might have used the wrong
> numbering of the symbols if the font has changed since then).
>
> >On the other hand I have my doubts it would work anyway,
> cause basicly
> >nothing really changed.
> >
> My guess is that you hadn't installed the font files in a
> folder where MikTeX could find them. This shouldn't be a
> problem in my solution.
>
> > Still the lytex file on the url should work for some
> version. Is there
> >a save way to get the files the author used without accidentically
> >removing my previous install of lilypond?
> >
> >
> Sorry, I don't understand your last question.
>
> /Mats
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
