Oops I meant to say... "C9add6 would also have the flatted seventh <c e g a bf d>" in first sentence of previous post, not <c e g a bf>
Rick Rick Hansen (aka RickH) wrote: > > C9add6 would also have the flatted seventh <c e g a bf> making it > completely different than C69, most readers know that a C9 functions as a > dominant spring and C69 as a tonic or major. But C69 omits the seventh <c > e g a d>. CM9 would have the natural maj seventh <c e g b d> . CM13 has > the natural maj seventh and the 6th (or thirteenth, 9th optional, 11th > omitted) <c e g b d a'> and <c e g b a'> are both CM13 chords with one > omitting the ninth. C13 again is a dominant flatted seventh with 11th > omitted, 9th optional, and 13th (or sixth) present depending on how your > instrument is able to finger it. > > Right about markup, we can always do that any time, but it wont transpose > making it useless for chords. I prefer using notes anyway <c e g> in the > ChordNames context, then add exceptions as needed, but thats just me. > That way I can code all my inversions correctly and use those note > variables over again on a staff with the correct inversions showing. If > the name that emitted on the ChordNames staff is not what I want I add it > to the exception list. But sometimes the exception lookup routine fails > because it's not a 1 to 1 lookup with your source file. And that is the > most frustrating "bug" that needs to be fixed. > > Rick > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/triangle-chord-notation-tf2042072.html#a5672886 Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
